Blog Post

Topics

Circumstantial Evidence
Concealed Weapon
Conspiracy
Crimes Against Elderly
Criminal Forfeitures and Seizures
Criminal Tax / Failure of Employer to Collect Withholding Tax
DNA Evidence
Deportation
Drugs
Expert Testimony
Fifth Amendment Rights
Florida Sales Tax Amnesty Program
Hearsay Evidence
I.R.S. Amnesty Program
Improper Cross-Examination
Improper Police Testimony
Jury Selection
Money Laundering
Mortgage Fraud
Offshore Banking
Plea Agreements, State Mandatory Compliance
Rape / Conviction Overturned
Road Rage
Self Defense
Self-Incrimination
Sentencing
Taping Phone Conversations
Tax Return Preparer Fraud

Recent Updates

July 20, 2010
Conviction for lewd and lascivious molestation and exhibition against a minor victim is reversed because the prosecutor used improper cross-examination to obtain conviction.

June 24, 2010
Florida Initiates Sales Tax Amnesty Program

June 21, 2010
Non-U.S. citizens convicted of crimes are subject to deportation

May 27, 2010
Florida Appellate Court rules that being in a room with others who are smoking marijuana and in which bags of marijuana were found, is not sufficient to establish that the defendant possessed marijuana.

April 27, 2010
It Is A Crime In Florida For A Person To Tape A Conversation Unless All Parties Of The Conversation Consent

Archives

May, 2009

Web Resources

FindLaw
Thomson West
U.S. Courts
Westlaw
United States Chamber of Commerce
FirstGov
Library of Congress
White House
Internal Revenue Service
Yahoo!Legal Blog Directory

F.B.I. And Other State And Local Officials Putting an Emphasis on Investigating Mortgage Fraud

Posted by: euser
May 11, 2009
Topic: Mortgage Fraud

Law enforcement officials, including state police authorities, the F.B.I. and state authorities, have given a high priority to mortgage fraud investigations.

One area of interest to authorities is the purchase of multiple properties using false statements to financial institutions to obtain a loan. Investigations target mortgage brokers, real estate appraisers, purchasers, and banking officials who have engaged in conduct that involves knowingly taking part in false loan applications.

Certain conduct raises a red flag including; (1) multiple purchases in which the buyer represents each house as the principle residence; (2) using a straw purchaser to get credit; and (3) mortgage brokers or real estate brokers improperly colluding with real estate appraisers to over-inflate real estate appraisals.

In addition, the use of false Social Security numbers, inflated representations of income, false tax returns, and other documentation falsely exaggerating income, are all items which may lead to an investigation and prosecution.

A person may have intentionally provided false information or may have unintentionally been used by others in the real estate, mortgage, or banking businesses who seek to receive their bonuses or commissions.

Likewise, those in the real estate and banking profession sometimes are the subject of unscrupulous buyers and borrowers.

Because federal sentencing guidelines are driven by the amount of potential loss to a bank or lending institution in determining the sentence, a first-time offender may find themselves facing incarceration, even though they have no prior criminal record.

It is important to treat all allegations of mortgage or bank fraud seriously since, even if incorrect, without proper representation, a criminal prosecution may occur.

This firm has seen a significant increase in mortgage fraud investigations and an aggressive stance being taken by all law enforcement officials. Early representation by an attorney experienced in mortgage and bank fraud defense is important to protect against investigations, prosecutions, and imprisonment for mortgage and banking fraud.